Amd fx 8350 test. UserBenchmark: AMD Athlon 3000G vs FX

UserBenchmark: AMD Athlon 3000G vs FX

Amd fx 8350 test

That is pretty impressive on paper. Overclocked speeds are impressive at 4. Preferably dropping the shared front end thing too. The theory behind it is simply, they should be more efficient and offer a notch more performance. Performance delta aint that great, unless I take up a hobby of using 7-zip to compress… the internet. Display backlight type, blanking time, and brightness are important too.

Next

UserBenchmark: AMD FX

Amd fx 8350 test

Example: a module with 2 cores but one of the cores having a hardwire to the alus of the second companion core like the fma units, plus a decoder smart enough to issue twice the ops to the main core when needed, retaining high performance on single thread but balancing automagically on full threaded load. Crysis 2 of course needs Object Detail dropped from Ultra because of the ridiculous tessellation. The point is, with a mixed bag of benchmarks with both, single and multi threaded scenarios alike, both architectures perform similar. Still, competing solutions like the Core i5-3470 and i5-3570K reduce those hitches to nearly nothing. Dual Core Mixed Speed 143 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed. That of course we are going to find out in topday's review. Power consumption is still quite crummy and is bad enough to be deal breaker in my opinion.

Next

The Vishera Review: AMD FX

Amd fx 8350 test

In a way that test has become obsolete. Sure, the single-threaded performance is still terrible, but at least it wins in the multi-threaded integer workloads it was designed for. Cache sizes remain the same as well, which keeps everything roughly the same. Piledriver covers this up with high clocks and a huge die. It has been this way since Core 2-era. This article is nothing more then a performance overview of all four processors released yesterday.

Next

AMD FX

Amd fx 8350 test

Its not unacceptable, unless you think a i7-3820 is also an unacceptable platform? Its clearly much slower than that. Still, Piledriver includes other modifications. Ratings Price — 9 Power Consumption — 5 Game Performance — 7 Single Core Performance — 6 Multi Core Performance — 7. You can read more about it. They have the same core count. Since haswell the speed champs are intel cpu's hands down and with the z97 boards and the new processors that will only work with the 97 boards, look out amd! Can we just skip all that nonsense and try to have honest dicussion? The monitor was plugged into a separate outlet. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual.

Next

AMD FX 8350 processor review

Amd fx 8350 test

Scientific computing MyriMatch proteomics MyriMatch is intended for use in proteomics, or the. CoreTemp indicates the TjMax at 90C. Surely that deserves to be at least mentioned. Perhaps that was the reason my attempts went like so: 4. In many games, a single, branchy control thread tends to be the performance limiter. The Fx-8350 is again an overclocked part, I wish someone would do a power scaling with the fx-8350. And, this is probably a major reason why it still continues to garner a lot of support from gamers and enthusiasts alike.

Next

AMD FX 8350 processor review

Amd fx 8350 test

We can quantify efficiency by looking at the amount of power used, in kilojoules, during the entirety of our test period, when the chips are busy and at idle. The table above supports that characterization. Now you can return in your cave. This seems to be much less than before but it needs a more thorough investigation. This yields an extra 0. These chips are obviously much larger than Intel's 22nm Ivy Bridge parts, but Intel has a full node advantage there which enables that.

Next